6,79 €
The Art of Being Right
The Art of Being Right
  • Sold out
The Art of Being Right
The Art of Being Right
El. knyga:
6,79 €
Controversial Dialectic is the art of disputing, and of disputing in such a way as to hold one's own, whether one is in the right or the wrong - per fas et nefas. A man may be objectively in the right, and nevertheless in the eyes of bystanders, and sometimes in his own, he may come off worst. For example, I may advance a proof of some assertion, and my adversary may refute the proof, and thus appear to have refuted the assertion, for which there may, nevertheless, be other proofs. In this cas…
0

The Art of Being Right (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

(4.12 Goodreads rating)

Description

Controversial Dialectic is the art of disputing, and of disputing in such a way as to hold one's own, whether one is in the right or the wrong - per fas et nefas.

A man may be objectively in the right, and nevertheless in the eyes of bystanders, and sometimes in his own, he may come off worst. For example, I may advance a proof of some assertion, and my adversary may refute the proof, and thus appear to have refuted the assertion, for which there may, nevertheless, be other proofs. In this case, of course, my adversary and I change he comes off best, although, as a matter of fact, he is in the wrong.

6,79 €
Log in and for this item
you will receive
0,07 Book Euros! ?

Electronic book:
Delivery after ordering is instant! Intended for reading only on a computer, tablet or other electronic device.

Lowest price in 30 days: 6,79 €

Lowest price recorded: Price has not changed

  • Author: Arthur Scopenhauer
  • Publisher:
  • Year: 2018
  • Pages: 113
  • ISBN: 9783748183716
  • ISBN-10: 3748183712
  • ISBN-13: 9783748183716
  • Format: ePub
  • Language: English English

Controversial Dialectic is the art of disputing, and of disputing in such a way as to hold one's own, whether one is in the right or the wrong - per fas et nefas.

A man may be objectively in the right, and nevertheless in the eyes of bystanders, and sometimes in his own, he may come off worst. For example, I may advance a proof of some assertion, and my adversary may refute the proof, and thus appear to have refuted the assertion, for which there may, nevertheless, be other proofs. In this case, of course, my adversary and I change he comes off best, although, as a matter of fact, he is in the wrong.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)