- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/3635081/9780521368384.jpg)
- Author: Stephen Prickett
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- ISBN-10: 0521368383
- ISBN-13: 9780521368384
- Format: 14 x 21.7 x 2.1 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Prickett charts the schism, opened at the end of the oighteenth century, between biblical hermeneutics and literary criticism. This split has profound implications for both contemporary biblical translation and literary theory. The author investigates the critical commonplace that religious language is essentially poetic, and traces the development of that view in the writings of Dennis and Vico, Herder and Eichhorn, Ccoleridge and Arnold, Wordsworth and Hopkins, and Austin Farrer and Paul Ricouer. This concept continues to provide a terminology for discussing narrative that can no longer be interpreted literally or allegorically, but has also led some critics to devise inadequate translation theories and conceptions of metaphor.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.22:02:43
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Stephen Prickett
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- ISBN-10: 0521368383
- ISBN-13: 9780521368384
- Format: 14 x 21.7 x 2.1 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Prickett charts the schism, opened at the end of the oighteenth century, between biblical hermeneutics and literary criticism. This split has profound implications for both contemporary biblical translation and literary theory. The author investigates the critical commonplace that religious language is essentially poetic, and traces the development of that view in the writings of Dennis and Vico, Herder and Eichhorn, Ccoleridge and Arnold, Wordsworth and Hopkins, and Austin Farrer and Paul Ricouer. This concept continues to provide a terminology for discussing narrative that can no longer be interpreted literally or allegorically, but has also led some critics to devise inadequate translation theories and conceptions of metaphor.
Reviews