- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4582021/9780893089092.jpg)
- Author: Wilena Roberts Bejach
- Publisher: Southern Historical Press
- ISBN-10: 0893089095
- ISBN-13: 9780893089092
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.9 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Williamson County, Tennessee Marriage Records, 1800-1850. (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
By: .Wilena Roberts BeJach, Pub. 1957, Reprinted 2018, 328 pages, Index, soft cover, ISBN #0-89308-909-5.
Williamson County was formed in 1799 from Davidson County, and until 1804 it extended to the Alabama line. Later counties cut out of this original Williamson County were: Bedford, Lincoln, Marshall, Maury, Rutherford, and Giles. This book contains over 5,000 marriages. All of which were copied from the original bonds and licenses. During this time frame, various factors such as: bad roads, long distances from court house, and weather would cause clergymen or justices of the peace who performed the ceremonies not to record the rites solemnized by them. Hence, we often find the bond but not the return by the official.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 19d.22:51:30
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Wilena Roberts Bejach
- Publisher: Southern Historical Press
- ISBN-10: 0893089095
- ISBN-13: 9780893089092
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.9 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
By: .Wilena Roberts BeJach, Pub. 1957, Reprinted 2018, 328 pages, Index, soft cover, ISBN #0-89308-909-5.
Williamson County was formed in 1799 from Davidson County, and until 1804 it extended to the Alabama line. Later counties cut out of this original Williamson County were: Bedford, Lincoln, Marshall, Maury, Rutherford, and Giles. This book contains over 5,000 marriages. All of which were copied from the original bonds and licenses. During this time frame, various factors such as: bad roads, long distances from court house, and weather would cause clergymen or justices of the peace who performed the ceremonies not to record the rites solemnized by them. Hence, we often find the bond but not the return by the official.
Reviews