- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13295229/9783668787834.jpg)
- Author: Anonym
- Publisher: GRIN Verlag
- Year: 2018
- Pages: 20
- ISBN-10: 3668787832
- ISBN-13: 9783668787834
- Format: 14 x 21.6 x 0.1 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Why is the distinction between primary and secondary sources a basis for scientific work and how do you assess a quote from Spiegelonline as a scientific source in this context? (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Communications - Methods and Research Logic, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, language: English, abstract: This essay deals with the question of why the distinction between primary and secondary sources is a basis for scientific work and how a quote from "Spiegelonline" is assessed as a scientific source in this context. In the course of this paper various reasons for a distinction between the source types will be depicted as well as why quoting from secondary sources entails problems. Also how those issues could pose as a serious danger to the quality of scientific work in general will be addressed. A scientific ethical point of view will be especially looked at in the main part of why a distinction between primary and secondary sources makes sense.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 22d.06:10:28
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Anonym
- Publisher: GRIN Verlag
- Year: 2018
- Pages: 20
- ISBN-10: 3668787832
- ISBN-13: 9783668787834
- Format: 14 x 21.6 x 0.1 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Essay from the year 2016 in the subject Communications - Methods and Research Logic, Leuphana Universität Lüneburg, language: English, abstract: This essay deals with the question of why the distinction between primary and secondary sources is a basis for scientific work and how a quote from "Spiegelonline" is assessed as a scientific source in this context. In the course of this paper various reasons for a distinction between the source types will be depicted as well as why quoting from secondary sources entails problems. Also how those issues could pose as a serious danger to the quality of scientific work in general will be addressed. A scientific ethical point of view will be especially looked at in the main part of why a distinction between primary and secondary sources makes sense.
Reviews