- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12564349/9781934843857.jpg)
- Author: Ruth Amir
- Publisher: Academic Studies Press
- ISBN-10: 1934843857
- ISBN-13: 9781934843857
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.9 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
With the Holocaust resonating as the "thick background," historical redress processes in Israel render a particularly challenging case. The simultaneous concern the Jewish community has with past, present and future redress campaigns, as both victim and perpetrator, is unique. Who is Afraid of Historical Redress analyzes three cases of historical redress in Israel: the Yemeni children affair, the tinea capitis irradiations and the claims for the return of native land of the two Christian Palestinian villages of Iqrit and Bir'em. All three cases were redressed under the juridical edifice of legal thought and action. The outcomes suggest that these processes were insufficient for achieving closure by the victims, atonement by those responsible and reconciliation among social groups.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.23:58:07
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Ruth Amir
- Publisher: Academic Studies Press
- ISBN-10: 1934843857
- ISBN-13: 9781934843857
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.9 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English English
With the Holocaust resonating as the "thick background," historical redress processes in Israel render a particularly challenging case. The simultaneous concern the Jewish community has with past, present and future redress campaigns, as both victim and perpetrator, is unique. Who is Afraid of Historical Redress analyzes three cases of historical redress in Israel: the Yemeni children affair, the tinea capitis irradiations and the claims for the return of native land of the two Christian Palestinian villages of Iqrit and Bir'em. All three cases were redressed under the juridical edifice of legal thought and action. The outcomes suggest that these processes were insufficient for achieving closure by the victims, atonement by those responsible and reconciliation among social groups.
Reviews