- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/7104947/9781249427728.jpg)
- Author: Nicole J Stanford
- Publisher: BiblioScholar
- ISBN-10: 124942772X
- ISBN-13: 9781249427728
- Format: 18.9 x 24.6 x 0.5 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
As a part of the response to the Al Qaida attacks on 11 September 2001, the United States found itself having to answer many difficult questions regarding its action in the Global War on Terrorism. One of the most contentious was the use of torture against captured enemy fighters. The United States, a strong proponent for humanitarian law, soon found itself criticized for its treatment of detainees. As a result, commentators and politicians have had endless debates about interrogation techniques and the legal applicability of international law and treaties to a nonstate enemy. The central research question derived from these issues is: Is torture a viable tool for use in achieving goals as outlined in the 2006 National Security Strategy? Interrogational torture was examined from the following standpoints: legal, effectiveness, and ethical. Results showed that torture is wrong. The next step applied the analytical results against the ethical decision-making triangle and also concluded that from the three standpoints torture was wrong and not a feasible means of achieving the United States' national security objectives.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 17d.00:23:28
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Nicole J Stanford
- Publisher: BiblioScholar
- ISBN-10: 124942772X
- ISBN-13: 9781249427728
- Format: 18.9 x 24.6 x 0.5 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
As a part of the response to the Al Qaida attacks on 11 September 2001, the United States found itself having to answer many difficult questions regarding its action in the Global War on Terrorism. One of the most contentious was the use of torture against captured enemy fighters. The United States, a strong proponent for humanitarian law, soon found itself criticized for its treatment of detainees. As a result, commentators and politicians have had endless debates about interrogation techniques and the legal applicability of international law and treaties to a nonstate enemy. The central research question derived from these issues is: Is torture a viable tool for use in achieving goals as outlined in the 2006 National Security Strategy? Interrogational torture was examined from the following standpoints: legal, effectiveness, and ethical. Results showed that torture is wrong. The next step applied the analytical results against the ethical decision-making triangle and also concluded that from the three standpoints torture was wrong and not a feasible means of achieving the United States' national security objectives.
Reviews