- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13509003/9786204161877.jpg)
- Author: Christophe Vallée
- Publisher: Our Knowledge Publishing
- ISBN-10: 6204161873
- ISBN-13: 9786204161877
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.1 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Why is the system as the philosopher's foundational discourse split into a doctrinal and a critical system, that is, into a body of knowledge and a critique of that knowledge? Transcendental reflection in the Kantian sense wants to link a given body of knowledge and the criticism of it; it is metaphysics of morals and metaphysics of nature.In contrast to Fichte, who in the Doctrine of Science (1794) wanted to bring together the three Critiques into an "absolute self" in order to go beyond the categories and the moral law, Kant claims that, if for doctrinal discourse, systematicity is based on the categories of pure intuition, i.e., on a metaphysics of nature, then, conversely, critical discourse is the basis of doctrinal discourse, and, consequently, there cannot be doctrinal assertive propositions that are based on the self.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 12d.04:02:27
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Christophe Vallée
- Publisher: Our Knowledge Publishing
- ISBN-10: 6204161873
- ISBN-13: 9786204161877
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.1 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
Why is the system as the philosopher's foundational discourse split into a doctrinal and a critical system, that is, into a body of knowledge and a critique of that knowledge? Transcendental reflection in the Kantian sense wants to link a given body of knowledge and the criticism of it; it is metaphysics of morals and metaphysics of nature.In contrast to Fichte, who in the Doctrine of Science (1794) wanted to bring together the three Critiques into an "absolute self" in order to go beyond the categories and the moral law, Kant claims that, if for doctrinal discourse, systematicity is based on the categories of pure intuition, i.e., on a metaphysics of nature, then, conversely, critical discourse is the basis of doctrinal discourse, and, consequently, there cannot be doctrinal assertive propositions that are based on the self.
Reviews