- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/11258127/9781576072004.jpg)
- Author: Thomas R Hensley
- Publisher: ABC-CLIO
- ISBN-10: 1576072002
- ISBN-13: 9781576072004
- Format: 17.8 x 26.2 x 3 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Did the Rehnquist Court, which followed the liberal Warren Court and the moderate Burger Court, achieve a conservative counterrevolution? Using quantitative data to supplement detailed opinion analysis, political scientist Thomas R. Hensley argues that continuity not change characterized the Rehnquist Court era. But without a doubt, the Rehnquist Court was frequently a war zone.
Fourteen justices served during the Rehnquist era, which began in 1986 during the Reagan administration and ended with Rehnquist's death in September 2005. Presidents Reagan and Bush appointed conservative justices and set in motion an assault on the "ultra-liberal" decisions made by the two previous courts. But President Clinton appointed two moderate Democrats, slowing the conservative juggernaut. The result? One of the most fascinating, contentious, and crucial periods in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 19d.04:21:54
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Thomas R Hensley
- Publisher: ABC-CLIO
- ISBN-10: 1576072002
- ISBN-13: 9781576072004
- Format: 17.8 x 26.2 x 3 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
Did the Rehnquist Court, which followed the liberal Warren Court and the moderate Burger Court, achieve a conservative counterrevolution? Using quantitative data to supplement detailed opinion analysis, political scientist Thomas R. Hensley argues that continuity not change characterized the Rehnquist Court era. But without a doubt, the Rehnquist Court was frequently a war zone.
Fourteen justices served during the Rehnquist era, which began in 1986 during the Reagan administration and ended with Rehnquist's death in September 2005. Presidents Reagan and Bush appointed conservative justices and set in motion an assault on the "ultra-liberal" decisions made by the two previous courts. But President Clinton appointed two moderate Democrats, slowing the conservative juggernaut. The result? One of the most fascinating, contentious, and crucial periods in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Reviews