- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/11270279/9781581122244.jpg)
- Author: John A Alifano
- Publisher: Dissertation.Com. - Do Not Use
- ISBN-10: 1581122241
- ISBN-13: 9781581122244
- Format: 18.9 x 24.6 x 0.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
The Pretribulation Rapture Doctrine and the Progressive Dispensational System (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
This thesis argues that progressive dispensationalism cannot integrate the pretribulation rapture doctrine into its reconstructed dispensational system on any basis of theological distinctiveness between the church and Israel. This will be accomplished by first setting forth the theological systems of the three major forms of dispensationalism that have existed during its history, namely, classical, revised, and progressive dispensationalism, and second, by showing that each of three kinds of theological distinctiveness, namely, anthropological, soteriological, and eschatological distinctiveness, are present in the classical and revised systems and therefore these systems can support the rapture's integration, but are not present in the progressive system and therefore this system cannot support the rapture's integration. The thesis closes with an explanation as to why progressive dispensationalism is more compatible with amillennialism than with premillennialism.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.22:43:50
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: John A Alifano
- Publisher: Dissertation.Com. - Do Not Use
- ISBN-10: 1581122241
- ISBN-13: 9781581122244
- Format: 18.9 x 24.6 x 0.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
This thesis argues that progressive dispensationalism cannot integrate the pretribulation rapture doctrine into its reconstructed dispensational system on any basis of theological distinctiveness between the church and Israel. This will be accomplished by first setting forth the theological systems of the three major forms of dispensationalism that have existed during its history, namely, classical, revised, and progressive dispensationalism, and second, by showing that each of three kinds of theological distinctiveness, namely, anthropological, soteriological, and eschatological distinctiveness, are present in the classical and revised systems and therefore these systems can support the rapture's integration, but are not present in the progressive system and therefore this system cannot support the rapture's integration. The thesis closes with an explanation as to why progressive dispensationalism is more compatible with amillennialism than with premillennialism.
Reviews