- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/https://libri-media.knygos-static.lt/250ce5e9-8abe-470c-93d5-57fd5e8fd77c/2)
- Author: Ricarda Schmidt-Scheele
- Publisher: Transcript Verlag
- Year: 2020
- Pages: 262
- ISBN-10: 3837653196
- ISBN-13: 9783837653199
- Format: 14.9 x 22.6 x 2.5 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
What does plausibility mean in relation to scenario planning and how do users of scenarios assess it? Despite the concept's ubiquity, its epistemological and empirical foundation remain unexplored in previous research.
Ricarda Schmidt-Scheele offers an interdisciplinary perspective: she presents approaches from philosophy of sciences, cognitive psychology, narrative theory, and linguistics, and tests key hypotheses in an experimental study. A conceptual map lays out indicators for scenario plausibility and explains how plausibility assessments vary across scenario methods. This helps researchers and practitioners to better understand the implications of their methodological choices in scenario development.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 24d.01:36:14
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Ricarda Schmidt-Scheele
- Publisher: Transcript Verlag
- Year: 2020
- Pages: 262
- ISBN-10: 3837653196
- ISBN-13: 9783837653199
- Format: 14.9 x 22.6 x 2.5 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
What does plausibility mean in relation to scenario planning and how do users of scenarios assess it? Despite the concept's ubiquity, its epistemological and empirical foundation remain unexplored in previous research.
Ricarda Schmidt-Scheele offers an interdisciplinary perspective: she presents approaches from philosophy of sciences, cognitive psychology, narrative theory, and linguistics, and tests key hypotheses in an experimental study. A conceptual map lays out indicators for scenario plausibility and explains how plausibility assessments vary across scenario methods. This helps researchers and practitioners to better understand the implications of their methodological choices in scenario development.
Reviews