- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4317701/9780792300410.jpg)
- Author: Jaakko Hintikka
- Publisher: Springer
- ISBN-10: 0792300416
- ISBN-13: 9780792300410
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.4 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
The Logic of Epistemology and the Epistemology of Logic (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
somewhat like Henkin's nonstandard interpretation of higher-order logics, while the right semantics [or logical modalities is an analogue to the standard of type theory in Henkin's sense. interpretation Another possibility would be to follow W.V. Quine's advice to give up logi- cal modalities as being beyond repair. Or we could also try to develop a logic of conceptual possibility, restricting the range of our "possible worlds" to those compatible with the transcendental presuppositions of our own conceptual sys- tem. This looks in fact like one of the most interesting possible theories I have dreamt of developing but undoubtedly never will. Its kinship with Kant's way of thinking should be obvious. Besides putting the entire enterprise of possible-worlds semantics into a perspective, we can also see that the actual history of possible-worlds seman- tics is more complicated than it might first appear to be. For the standard in- terpretation of modal logics has reared its beautiful head repeatedly in the writings of Stig Kanger, Richard Montague the pre-Montague-semantics theorist, and Nino Cocchiarella.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.19:00:17
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Jaakko Hintikka
- Publisher: Springer
- ISBN-10: 0792300416
- ISBN-13: 9780792300410
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.4 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
somewhat like Henkin's nonstandard interpretation of higher-order logics, while the right semantics [or logical modalities is an analogue to the standard of type theory in Henkin's sense. interpretation Another possibility would be to follow W.V. Quine's advice to give up logi- cal modalities as being beyond repair. Or we could also try to develop a logic of conceptual possibility, restricting the range of our "possible worlds" to those compatible with the transcendental presuppositions of our own conceptual sys- tem. This looks in fact like one of the most interesting possible theories I have dreamt of developing but undoubtedly never will. Its kinship with Kant's way of thinking should be obvious. Besides putting the entire enterprise of possible-worlds semantics into a perspective, we can also see that the actual history of possible-worlds seman- tics is more complicated than it might first appear to be. For the standard in- terpretation of modal logics has reared its beautiful head repeatedly in the writings of Stig Kanger, Richard Montague the pre-Montague-semantics theorist, and Nino Cocchiarella.
Reviews