- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13225464/9783658044374.jpg)
- Author: Malte KaÃner
- Publisher: Springer vs
- Year: 2013
- Pages: 362
- ISBN-10: 3658044373
- ISBN-13: 9783658044374
- Format: 14.8 x 21 x 2.2 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
The Influence of the Type of Dominant Party on Democracy (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
Dominant parties and democracies - are they really strange bedfellows? Malte KaÃner sheds light on the relation between one-party dominance and democracy from a comparative perspective. The study examines the key question how different types of dominant parties influence democracy in multicultural societies with the help of two case studies: South Africa and Malaysia. Both countries are characterized by an ethnically, linguistically and religiously plural society. The author analyses the two dominant parties African National Congress (ANC) and United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and their implications on democracy in the two countries. The outcome suggests that one-party dominance per se cannot be assessed as beneficial or harmful for democratic development. Rather, dominant parties deserve a stronger analytical differentiation. Causal patterns contribute to such a differentiation.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 22d.10:22:29
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Malte KaÃner
- Publisher: Springer vs
- Year: 2013
- Pages: 362
- ISBN-10: 3658044373
- ISBN-13: 9783658044374
- Format: 14.8 x 21 x 2.2 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Dominant parties and democracies - are they really strange bedfellows? Malte KaÃner sheds light on the relation between one-party dominance and democracy from a comparative perspective. The study examines the key question how different types of dominant parties influence democracy in multicultural societies with the help of two case studies: South Africa and Malaysia. Both countries are characterized by an ethnically, linguistically and religiously plural society. The author analyses the two dominant parties African National Congress (ANC) and United Malays National Organization (UMNO) and their implications on democracy in the two countries. The outcome suggests that one-party dominance per se cannot be assessed as beneficial or harmful for democratic development. Rather, dominant parties deserve a stronger analytical differentiation. Causal patterns contribute to such a differentiation.
Reviews