Reviews
Description
Can the EU be held legally responsible for contributions to unlawful human rights separately from its Member States? This is at the heart of this important new study.
Taking an innovative approach, rather than assess the EU's contribution to human rights violations, it asks if such conduct can be legally contested before a court of law. It takes a clear, two-part approach: firstly, it deconstructs and analyses the theoretical international and EU human rights responsibility regime. Secondly, the book applies this regime to four case studies looking at international border management. This allows it to establish a theory of 'relational human rights responsibility' in order to hold the EU responsible for its complicity in human rights harms. Blending litigation, theory and rights analysis, this is a new approach to enforcing and protecting human rights.EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 20d.14:30:39
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
Can the EU be held legally responsible for contributions to unlawful human rights separately from its Member States? This is at the heart of this important new study.
Taking an innovative approach, rather than assess the EU's contribution to human rights violations, it asks if such conduct can be legally contested before a court of law. It takes a clear, two-part approach: firstly, it deconstructs and analyses the theoretical international and EU human rights responsibility regime. Secondly, the book applies this regime to four case studies looking at international border management. This allows it to establish a theory of 'relational human rights responsibility' in order to hold the EU responsible for its complicity in human rights harms. Blending litigation, theory and rights analysis, this is a new approach to enforcing and protecting human rights.
Reviews