75,95 €
84,39 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
The debate on the rebate
The debate on the rebate
75,95
84,39 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
Bachelor Thesis from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), language: English, abstract: In the conclusion of the European Council in December 2005, the Presidency mentions only in a single sentence what had filled covers of newspapers the days before: "The European Council reached agreement on the Financial Perspective 2007-2013 as set out in doc. 15915/05."1 It was the second attempt after a former Counci…
84.39
  • Publisher:
  • Year: 2007
  • Pages: 48
  • ISBN-10: 3638662055
  • ISBN-13: 9783638662055
  • Format: 14.8 x 21 x 0.3 cm, minkšti viršeliai
  • Language: English
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

The debate on the rebate (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

Description

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), language: English, abstract: In the conclusion of the European Council in December 2005, the Presidency mentions only in a single sentence what had filled covers of newspapers the days before: "The European Council reached agreement on the Financial Perspective 2007-2013 as set out in doc. 15915/05."1 It was the second attempt after a former Council six month before, and also this time it needed tough negotiations and a number of revised proposals, until the quoted sentence could be printed. The reason for this controversy can be summarized in an old German adage: "Beim Geld hört die Freundschaft auf." Those who are partners in other situations begin to bargain over every Euro they have to spend for the EU budget, giving short-term national interests priority to long-term EU interests. In some way this is understandable, despite the fact that the Council should bring forward the European project - politicians are elected in the nation states and have to justify every Euro they leave in Brussels. Besides this, the term of "solidarity" has neither in Article I-2 of the "Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe"2, nor in article 1 of the "Treaty on European Union"3 been concretised. But nevertheless the difficulties surrounding the agreement on the Financial Perspective are symptoms of a serious problem: Countries which pay more into the budget than they get back, the so-called net contributors, feel to have unacceptable high costs in relation to the benefits they gain from their EU-Membership. The debate on "net positions" is one of the major reasons which lead to the low acceptance of the European Union in public: According to Eurobarometer, 62% of the population are worried "about the increasing costs for the Member States of building Europe."4 Only the fear of a transfer of jobs to other Member States was mentio

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

75,95
84,39 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 23d.09:44:40

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 0,84 Book Euros!?
  • Author: Daniel Neugebauer
  • Publisher:
  • Year: 2007
  • Pages: 48
  • ISBN-10: 3638662055
  • ISBN-13: 9783638662055
  • Format: 14.8 x 21 x 0.3 cm, minkšti viršeliai
  • Language: English English

Bachelor Thesis from the year 2006 in the subject Politics - Topic: European Union, grade: 1, University of Twente (Bedrijf Bestuur en Technologie), language: English, abstract: In the conclusion of the European Council in December 2005, the Presidency mentions only in a single sentence what had filled covers of newspapers the days before: "The European Council reached agreement on the Financial Perspective 2007-2013 as set out in doc. 15915/05."1 It was the second attempt after a former Council six month before, and also this time it needed tough negotiations and a number of revised proposals, until the quoted sentence could be printed. The reason for this controversy can be summarized in an old German adage: "Beim Geld hört die Freundschaft auf." Those who are partners in other situations begin to bargain over every Euro they have to spend for the EU budget, giving short-term national interests priority to long-term EU interests. In some way this is understandable, despite the fact that the Council should bring forward the European project - politicians are elected in the nation states and have to justify every Euro they leave in Brussels. Besides this, the term of "solidarity" has neither in Article I-2 of the "Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe"2, nor in article 1 of the "Treaty on European Union"3 been concretised. But nevertheless the difficulties surrounding the agreement on the Financial Perspective are symptoms of a serious problem: Countries which pay more into the budget than they get back, the so-called net contributors, feel to have unacceptable high costs in relation to the benefits they gain from their EU-Membership. The debate on "net positions" is one of the major reasons which lead to the low acceptance of the European Union in public: According to Eurobarometer, 62% of the population are worried "about the increasing costs for the Member States of building Europe."4 Only the fear of a transfer of jobs to other Member States was mentio

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)