- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4360388/9780804757249.jpg)
- Author: Brian K Pinaire
- Publisher: Stanford Law Books
- ISBN-10: 0804757240
- ISBN-13: 9780804757249
- Format: 15.9 x 23.6 x 2.4 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Bush v. Gore brought to the public's attention the significance of election law and the United States Supreme Court's role in structuring the rules that govern how campaigns and elections function in America. In this book, Brian K. Pinaire examines one expanding domain within this larger legal context: freedom of speech in the political process, or, what he terms, electoral speech law.
Specifically, Pinaire examines the Court's evolving conceptions of free speech in the electoral process and then traces the consequences of various debates and determinations from the post-World War II era to the present. In his analysis of the broad range of cases from this period, supplemented by four recent case study investigations, Pinaire explores competing visions of electoral expression in the marketplace of ideas, various methods for analyzing speech dilemmas, the multiple influences that shape the justices' notions of both the potential for and privileged status of electoral communication, and the ultimate implications of these Court rulings for American democracy.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.17:32:08
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Brian K Pinaire
- Publisher: Stanford Law Books
- ISBN-10: 0804757240
- ISBN-13: 9780804757249
- Format: 15.9 x 23.6 x 2.4 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Bush v. Gore brought to the public's attention the significance of election law and the United States Supreme Court's role in structuring the rules that govern how campaigns and elections function in America. In this book, Brian K. Pinaire examines one expanding domain within this larger legal context: freedom of speech in the political process, or, what he terms, electoral speech law.
Specifically, Pinaire examines the Court's evolving conceptions of free speech in the electoral process and then traces the consequences of various debates and determinations from the post-World War II era to the present. In his analysis of the broad range of cases from this period, supplemented by four recent case study investigations, Pinaire explores competing visions of electoral expression in the marketplace of ideas, various methods for analyzing speech dilemmas, the multiple influences that shape the justices' notions of both the potential for and privileged status of electoral communication, and the ultimate implications of these Court rulings for American democracy.
Reviews