- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12283177/9781794887756.jpg)
- Author: Prof H C Mehmet ŞÃ¼krü Güzel
- Publisher: Lulu Press
- ISBN-10: 179488775X
- ISBN-13: 9781794887756
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.2 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
The Chagos Archipelago Case in the International Court of Justice (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
"Full implementation of Article 73 of the UN Charter is an obligation for the administrative states as well for the UK for the territorial integrity of Mauritius. The Lancaster House Undertakings is under the ex injuria jus non oritur principle, that unjust acts cannot create law. The UK did not fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by Article 73 in accordance with Article 2 (2) of the UN`s Charter. The Advisory Opinion interpreted by the ICJ is Article 38 (1) (b) created a new colony;the ICJ should have used Article 38 (1) (a) as the source of law for its decision.The decision of the ICJ is under the definition of an internationally wrongful act of an international organization by interpreting Article 38 (1) (b) of its Statute as the source for the Advisory Opinion interpretation.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 22d.12:27:16
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Prof H C Mehmet ŞÃ¼krü Güzel
- Publisher: Lulu Press
- ISBN-10: 179488775X
- ISBN-13: 9781794887756
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.2 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
"Full implementation of Article 73 of the UN Charter is an obligation for the administrative states as well for the UK for the territorial integrity of Mauritius. The Lancaster House Undertakings is under the ex injuria jus non oritur principle, that unjust acts cannot create law. The UK did not fulfill in good faith the obligations assumed by Article 73 in accordance with Article 2 (2) of the UN`s Charter. The Advisory Opinion interpreted by the ICJ is Article 38 (1) (b) created a new colony;the ICJ should have used Article 38 (1) (a) as the source of law for its decision.The decision of the ICJ is under the definition of an internationally wrongful act of an international organization by interpreting Article 38 (1) (b) of its Statute as the source for the Advisory Opinion interpretation.
Reviews