- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4235146/9780761860051.jpg)
- Author: Paul Lambert
- Publisher: University Press of America
- ISBN-10: 0761860053
- ISBN-13: 9780761860051
- Format: 15.5 x 23.1 x 4.3 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with-and sometimes even embrace-technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 7d.15:29:41
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Paul Lambert
- Publisher: University Press of America
- ISBN-10: 0761860053
- ISBN-13: 9780761860051
- Format: 15.5 x 23.1 x 4.3 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with-and sometimes even embrace-technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.
Reviews