- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12355565/9781841137216.jpg)
- Publisher: Hart Publishing
- Year: 2010
- Pages: 267
- ISBN-10: 1841137219
- ISBN-13: 9781841137216
- Format: 15.5 x 23.1 x 1.8 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Stakeholders in the Law School (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
This collection brings together a distinguished group of researchers to examine the power relations which are played out in university law schools as a result of the different pressures exerted upon them by a range of different 'stakeholders'. From students to governments, from lawyers to universities, a host of institutions and actors believe that law schools should take account of a vast number of (often conflicting) considerations when teaching their students, designing curricula, carrying out research and so on. How do law schools deal with these pressures? What should their response be to the 'stakeholders' who urge them to follow agendas emanating from outside the law school itself? To what extent should some of these agendas play a greater role in the thinking of law schools?
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 17d.23:46:22
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Publisher: Hart Publishing
- Year: 2010
- Pages: 267
- ISBN-10: 1841137219
- ISBN-13: 9781841137216
- Format: 15.5 x 23.1 x 1.8 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
This collection brings together a distinguished group of researchers to examine the power relations which are played out in university law schools as a result of the different pressures exerted upon them by a range of different 'stakeholders'. From students to governments, from lawyers to universities, a host of institutions and actors believe that law schools should take account of a vast number of (often conflicting) considerations when teaching their students, designing curricula, carrying out research and so on. How do law schools deal with these pressures? What should their response be to the 'stakeholders' who urge them to follow agendas emanating from outside the law school itself? To what extent should some of these agendas play a greater role in the thinking of law schools?
Reviews