- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12954901/9783030010591.jpg)
- Author: Cyrus Tata
- Publisher: PALGRAVE PIVOT
- ISBN-10: 3030010597
- ISBN-13: 9783030010591
- Format: 14.8 x 21 x 1.3 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
This book asks how we should make sense of sentencing when, despite huge efforts world-wide to analyse, critique and reform it, it remains an enigma.Sentencing: A Social Process reveals how both research and policy-thinking about sentencing are confined by a paradigm that presumes autonomous individualism, projecting an artificial image of sentencing practices and policy potential. By conceiving of sentencing instead as a social process, the book advances new policy and research agendas. Sentencing: A Social Process proposes innovative solutions to classic conundrums, including: rules versus discretion; aggravating versus mitigating factors; individualisation versus consistency; punishment versus rehabilitation; efficient technologies versus the quality of justice; and ways of reducing imprisonment.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 16d.05:07:42
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Cyrus Tata
- Publisher: PALGRAVE PIVOT
- ISBN-10: 3030010597
- ISBN-13: 9783030010591
- Format: 14.8 x 21 x 1.3 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
This book asks how we should make sense of sentencing when, despite huge efforts world-wide to analyse, critique and reform it, it remains an enigma.Sentencing: A Social Process reveals how both research and policy-thinking about sentencing are confined by a paradigm that presumes autonomous individualism, projecting an artificial image of sentencing practices and policy potential. By conceiving of sentencing instead as a social process, the book advances new policy and research agendas. Sentencing: A Social Process proposes innovative solutions to classic conundrums, including: rules versus discretion; aggravating versus mitigating factors; individualisation versus consistency; punishment versus rehabilitation; efficient technologies versus the quality of justice; and ways of reducing imprisonment.
Reviews