63,08 €
70,09 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Rethinking the Gospel Sources, Volume 2
Rethinking the Gospel Sources, Volume 2
63,08
70,09 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
This work examines three disputed issues in the study of Q, the hypothetical source common to the Gospels of Matthew and Luke: its existence; its unity as a document; and the plurality of its wording. It evaluates the arguments for and against the existence of Q and concludes that some form of the Q hypothesis is necessary. It presents new evidence that most of the Q material existed as a single written source unified by recurring features of style and theme. Finally, it argues that differences…
70.09
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Rethinking the Gospel Sources, Volume 2 (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

(3.00 Goodreads rating)

Description

This work examines three disputed issues in the study of Q, the hypothetical source common to the Gospels of Matthew and Luke: its existence; its unity as a document; and the plurality of its wording. It evaluates the arguments for and against the existence of Q and concludes that some form of the Q hypothesis is necessary. It presents new evidence that most of the Q material existed as a single written source unified by recurring features of style and theme. Finally, it argues that differences between Matthew and Luke in the wording of Q were caused most often when one Evangelist replaced or combined Q with parallel material from another source.

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

63,08
70,09 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 21d.23:12:05

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 0,70 Book Euros!?

This work examines three disputed issues in the study of Q, the hypothetical source common to the Gospels of Matthew and Luke: its existence; its unity as a document; and the plurality of its wording. It evaluates the arguments for and against the existence of Q and concludes that some form of the Q hypothesis is necessary. It presents new evidence that most of the Q material existed as a single written source unified by recurring features of style and theme. Finally, it argues that differences between Matthew and Luke in the wording of Q were caused most often when one Evangelist replaced or combined Q with parallel material from another source.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)