- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/2878624/9780195137064.jpg)
- Author: John Brooke
- Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
- ISBN-10: 019513706X
- ISBN-13: 9780195137064
- Format: 15 x 23.4 x 2.5 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
This book, first published in the U.K. by T&T Clark, expands on the authors' prestigious Glasgow Gifford Lectures of 1995-6. Brooke and Cantor herein examine the many different ways in which the relationship between science and religion has been presented throughout history. They contend that, in fact, neither science nor religion is reducible to some timeless essence--and they deftly criticize the various master-narratives that have been put forward in support of such essentialist theses. Along the way, they repeatedly demolish the clichés so typical of popular histories of the science and religion debate, demonstrating the impossibility of reducing these debates to a single narrative, or of narrowing this relationship to a paradigm of conflict.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 22d.05:53:10
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: John Brooke
- Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
- ISBN-10: 019513706X
- ISBN-13: 9780195137064
- Format: 15 x 23.4 x 2.5 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
This book, first published in the U.K. by T&T Clark, expands on the authors' prestigious Glasgow Gifford Lectures of 1995-6. Brooke and Cantor herein examine the many different ways in which the relationship between science and religion has been presented throughout history. They contend that, in fact, neither science nor religion is reducible to some timeless essence--and they deftly criticize the various master-narratives that have been put forward in support of such essentialist theses. Along the way, they repeatedly demolish the clichés so typical of popular histories of the science and religion debate, demonstrating the impossibility of reducing these debates to a single narrative, or of narrowing this relationship to a paradigm of conflict.
Reviews