- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13166192/9783631573365.jpg)
- Author: Oliver Frör
- Publisher: Peter Lang D
- ISBN-10: 3631573367
- ISBN-13: 9783631573365
- Format: 14.7 x 20.8 x 2.3 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Survey based valuation techniques like the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) rely particularly on the premise of respondents' rationality when answering willingness to pay (WTP) questions. Results of CVM surveys have repeatedly put this fundamental assumption into question. This study adopts a more realistic view of rationality accounting for respondents' limited capacities to process information. Based on cognitive psychology a technique to detect and analyze the bounds of rationality inherent in WTP statements is developed. Using an empirical example, the influence of bounded rationality on the validity of CVM results is analyzed. It is shown that individual differences in information processing play a major role. From these results recommendations for future survey design are developed.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.23:36:43
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Oliver Frör
- Publisher: Peter Lang D
- ISBN-10: 3631573367
- ISBN-13: 9783631573365
- Format: 14.7 x 20.8 x 2.3 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Survey based valuation techniques like the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) rely particularly on the premise of respondents' rationality when answering willingness to pay (WTP) questions. Results of CVM surveys have repeatedly put this fundamental assumption into question. This study adopts a more realistic view of rationality accounting for respondents' limited capacities to process information. Based on cognitive psychology a technique to detect and analyze the bounds of rationality inherent in WTP statements is developed. Using an empirical example, the influence of bounded rationality on the validity of CVM results is analyzed. It is shown that individual differences in information processing play a major role. From these results recommendations for future survey design are developed.
Reviews