- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/14254260/9781009462310.jpg)
- Author: Neil Levy
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- ISBN-10: 1009462318
- ISBN-13: 9781009462310
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.6 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Peer review is supposed to ensure that published work, in philosophy and in other disciplines, meets high standards of rigor and interest. But many people fear that it no longer is fit to play this role. This Element examines some of their concerns. It uses evidence that critics of peer review sometimes cite to show its failures, as well as empirical literature on the reception of bullshit, to advance positive claims about how the assessment of scholarly work is appropriately influenced by features of the context in which it appears: for example, by readers' knowledge of authorship or of publication venue. Reader attitude makes an appropriate and sometimes decisive difference to perceptions of argument quality. This Element finishes by considering the difference that author attitudes to their own arguments can appropriately make to their reception. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 15d.01:21:37
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Neil Levy
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- ISBN-10: 1009462318
- ISBN-13: 9781009462310
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.6 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
Peer review is supposed to ensure that published work, in philosophy and in other disciplines, meets high standards of rigor and interest. But many people fear that it no longer is fit to play this role. This Element examines some of their concerns. It uses evidence that critics of peer review sometimes cite to show its failures, as well as empirical literature on the reception of bullshit, to advance positive claims about how the assessment of scholarly work is appropriately influenced by features of the context in which it appears: for example, by readers' knowledge of authorship or of publication venue. Reader attitude makes an appropriate and sometimes decisive difference to perceptions of argument quality. This Element finishes by considering the difference that author attitudes to their own arguments can appropriately make to their reception. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
Reviews