- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13570712/9789041152640.jpg)
- Author: Nadja Erk
- Publisher: Kluwer Law International
- Year: 2014
- Pages: 352
- ISBN-10: 9041152644
- ISBN-13: 9789041152640
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 2.1 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
It seems against the logic of the partiesè^-- choice, either in litigation or arbitration, to pursue both dispute resolution methods at the same time. Yet the reasons and incentives to initiate parallel proceedings are manifold, and indeed such proceedings have proliferated in recent years. Partiesè^-- motivation to initiate a set of proceedings in parallel to proceedings already in progress usually boils down to the expectation that some other forum than the one before which proceedings have already been commenced might produce better results. In other words, the respective advantages to be expected in either litigating or arbitrating in a specific jurisdiction constitute the main motivation for initiating parallel proceedings.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 17d.12:14:41
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Nadja Erk
- Publisher: Kluwer Law International
- Year: 2014
- Pages: 352
- ISBN-10: 9041152644
- ISBN-13: 9789041152640
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 2.1 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
It seems against the logic of the partiesè^-- choice, either in litigation or arbitration, to pursue both dispute resolution methods at the same time. Yet the reasons and incentives to initiate parallel proceedings are manifold, and indeed such proceedings have proliferated in recent years. Partiesè^-- motivation to initiate a set of proceedings in parallel to proceedings already in progress usually boils down to the expectation that some other forum than the one before which proceedings have already been commenced might produce better results. In other words, the respective advantages to be expected in either litigating or arbitrating in a specific jurisdiction constitute the main motivation for initiating parallel proceedings.
Reviews