229,67 €
255,19 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures
Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures
229,67
255,19 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
This book is a historical-epistemological study of one of the most consequential breakthroughs in the history of celestial mechanics: Robert Hooke's (1635-1703) proposal to compoun[d] the celestial motions of the planets of a direct motion by the tangent & an attractive motion towards a centrat body (Newton, The Correspondence li, 297. Henceforth: Correspondence). This is the challenge Hooke presented to Isaac Newton (1642-1727) in a short but intense correspondence in the winter of 1679-80, wh…
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN-10: 1402007329
  • ISBN-13: 9781402007323
  • Format: 15.9 x 25 x 1.7 cm, kieti viršeliai
  • Language: English
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Meanest Foundations and Nobler Superstructures (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

Description

This book is a historical-epistemological study of one of the most consequential breakthroughs in the history of celestial mechanics: Robert Hooke's (1635-1703) proposal to compoun[d] the celestial motions of the planets of a direct motion by the tangent & an attractive motion towards a centrat body (Newton, The Correspondence li, 297. Henceforth: Correspondence). This is the challenge Hooke presented to Isaac Newton (1642-1727) in a short but intense correspondence in the winter of 1679-80, which set Newton on course for his 1687 Principia, transforming the very concept of the planetary heavens in the process (Herivel, 301: De Motu, Version III). 1 It is difficult to overstate the novelty of Hooke 's Programme - The celestial motions, it suggested, those proverbial symbols of stability and immutability, werein fact a process of continuous change: a deflection of the planets from original rectilinear paths by a centraU attractive power (Correspondence, li, 313). There was nothing necessary or essential in the shape of planetary orbits. Already known to be not circular nor concentricall (ibid. ), Hooke claimed that these apparently closed curve Line[ s ] should be understood and calculated as mere effects of rectilinear motions and rectilinear attraction. And as Newton was quick to realize, this also implied that the planets neither move exactly in ellipse nor revolve twice in the same orbit, so that there are as many orbits to a planet as it has revolutions (Herivel, 301: De Motu, Version III).

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

229,67
255,19 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 21d.06:36:01

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 2,55 Book Euros!?
  • Author: Ofer Gal
  • Publisher:
  • ISBN-10: 1402007329
  • ISBN-13: 9781402007323
  • Format: 15.9 x 25 x 1.7 cm, kieti viršeliai
  • Language: English English

This book is a historical-epistemological study of one of the most consequential breakthroughs in the history of celestial mechanics: Robert Hooke's (1635-1703) proposal to compoun[d] the celestial motions of the planets of a direct motion by the tangent & an attractive motion towards a centrat body (Newton, The Correspondence li, 297. Henceforth: Correspondence). This is the challenge Hooke presented to Isaac Newton (1642-1727) in a short but intense correspondence in the winter of 1679-80, which set Newton on course for his 1687 Principia, transforming the very concept of the planetary heavens in the process (Herivel, 301: De Motu, Version III). 1 It is difficult to overstate the novelty of Hooke 's Programme - The celestial motions, it suggested, those proverbial symbols of stability and immutability, werein fact a process of continuous change: a deflection of the planets from original rectilinear paths by a centraU attractive power (Correspondence, li, 313). There was nothing necessary or essential in the shape of planetary orbits. Already known to be not circular nor concentricall (ibid. ), Hooke claimed that these apparently closed curve Line[ s ] should be understood and calculated as mere effects of rectilinear motions and rectilinear attraction. And as Newton was quick to realize, this also implied that the planets neither move exactly in ellipse nor revolve twice in the same orbit, so that there are as many orbits to a planet as it has revolutions (Herivel, 301: De Motu, Version III).

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)