- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/11329710/9781597520416.jpg)
- Author: A K M Adam
- Publisher: Wipf & Stock Publishers
- ISBN-10: 1597520411
- ISBN-13: 9781597520416
- Format: 15.5 x 23 x 1.4 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Critics have tried to revitalize the discipline of New Testament theology. The results of their labors are often disappointing. A. K. M. Adam suggests the problems many sense in New Testament theology arise from a mismatch of method and goals. That mismatch stems from a preoccupation with modernity as resident in the hallowed halls of regnant historical criticism. We need a hermeneutics of theology, a hermeneutics of hermeneutics. Adam here helps us understand what to keep of the historical-critical perspective when the realization hits that we have been sold a bill of goods that no longer makes good on its promises. In that sense, Adam's book is far more friendly to the historical-critical method as such than unfriendly (editor's preface).
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.13:32:06
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: A K M Adam
- Publisher: Wipf & Stock Publishers
- ISBN-10: 1597520411
- ISBN-13: 9781597520416
- Format: 15.5 x 23 x 1.4 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Critics have tried to revitalize the discipline of New Testament theology. The results of their labors are often disappointing. A. K. M. Adam suggests the problems many sense in New Testament theology arise from a mismatch of method and goals. That mismatch stems from a preoccupation with modernity as resident in the hallowed halls of regnant historical criticism. We need a hermeneutics of theology, a hermeneutics of hermeneutics. Adam here helps us understand what to keep of the historical-critical perspective when the realization hits that we have been sold a bill of goods that no longer makes good on its promises. In that sense, Adam's book is far more friendly to the historical-critical method as such than unfriendly (editor's preface).
Reviews