115,73 €
128,59 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Majority Rule or Minority Will
Majority Rule or Minority Will
115,73
128,59 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
This book examines the influence of precedent on the behavior of the US Supreme Court justices throughout the Court's history. Supreme Court justices almost always "follow" precedent, in that they always cite precedents for the positions they take. Because there are always precedents on either side of a case for justices to follow, following precedent does not mean that the justices are ever influenced by precedent. Employing the assumption that for precedent to be an influence on the behavior…
128.59
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Majority Rule or Minority Will (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

Description

This book examines the influence of precedent on the behavior of the US Supreme Court justices throughout the Court's history. Supreme Court justices almost always "follow" precedent, in that they always cite precedents for the positions they take. Because there are always precedents on either side of a case for justices to follow, following precedent does not mean that the justices are ever influenced by precedent. Employing the assumption that for precedent to be an influence on the behavior of justices, it must lead to a result they would not otherwise have reached, the authors show that precedent rarely controls the justices' votes.

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

115,73
128,59 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 23d.04:11:54

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 1,29 Book Euros!?

This book examines the influence of precedent on the behavior of the US Supreme Court justices throughout the Court's history. Supreme Court justices almost always "follow" precedent, in that they always cite precedents for the positions they take. Because there are always precedents on either side of a case for justices to follow, following precedent does not mean that the justices are ever influenced by precedent. Employing the assumption that for precedent to be an influence on the behavior of justices, it must lead to a result they would not otherwise have reached, the authors show that precedent rarely controls the justices' votes.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)