224,72 €
249,69 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty
Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty
224,72
249,69 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
It is the business of science not to create laws, but to discover them. We do not originate the constitution of our own minds, greatly as it may be in our power to modify their character. And as the laws of the human intellect do not depend upon our will, so the forms of science, of (1. 1) which they constitute the basis, are in all essential regards independent of individual choice. George Boole [10, p. llJ 1. 1 Comparison with Traditional Logic The logic of this book is a probability logic bu…
249.69
  • Publisher:
  • Year: 1998
  • Pages: 420
  • ISBN-10: 3790810568
  • ISBN-13: 9783790810561
  • Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 2.5 cm, kieti viršeliai
  • Language: English
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Logical Structures for Representation of Knowledge and Uncertainty (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

(4.00 Goodreads rating)

Description

It is the business of science not to create laws, but to discover them. We do not originate the constitution of our own minds, greatly as it may be in our power to modify their character. And as the laws of the human intellect do not depend upon our will, so the forms of science, of (1. 1) which they constitute the basis, are in all essential regards independent of individual choice. George Boole [10, p. llJ 1. 1 Comparison with Traditional Logic The logic of this book is a probability logic built on top of a yes-no or 2-valued logic. It is divided into two parts, part I: BP Logic, and part II: M Logic. 'BP' stands for 'Bayes Postulate'. This postulate says that in the absence of knowl- edge concerning a probability distribution over a universe or space one should assume 1 a uniform distribution. 2 The M logic of part II does not make use of Bayes postulate or of any other postulates or axioms. It relies exclusively on purely deductive reasoning following from the definition of probabilities. The M logic goes an important step further than the BP logic in that it can distinguish between certain types of information supply sentences which have the same representation in the BP logic as well as in traditional first order logic, although they clearly have different meanings (see example 6. 1. 2; also comments to the Paris-Rome problem of eqs. (1. 8), (1. 9) below).

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

224,72
249,69 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 21d.10:34:27

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 2,50 Book Euros!?
  • Author: Ellen Hisdal
  • Publisher:
  • Year: 1998
  • Pages: 420
  • ISBN-10: 3790810568
  • ISBN-13: 9783790810561
  • Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 2.5 cm, kieti viršeliai
  • Language: English English

It is the business of science not to create laws, but to discover them. We do not originate the constitution of our own minds, greatly as it may be in our power to modify their character. And as the laws of the human intellect do not depend upon our will, so the forms of science, of (1. 1) which they constitute the basis, are in all essential regards independent of individual choice. George Boole [10, p. llJ 1. 1 Comparison with Traditional Logic The logic of this book is a probability logic built on top of a yes-no or 2-valued logic. It is divided into two parts, part I: BP Logic, and part II: M Logic. 'BP' stands for 'Bayes Postulate'. This postulate says that in the absence of knowl- edge concerning a probability distribution over a universe or space one should assume 1 a uniform distribution. 2 The M logic of part II does not make use of Bayes postulate or of any other postulates or axioms. It relies exclusively on purely deductive reasoning following from the definition of probabilities. The M logic goes an important step further than the BP logic in that it can distinguish between certain types of information supply sentences which have the same representation in the BP logic as well as in traditional first order logic, although they clearly have different meanings (see example 6. 1. 2; also comments to the Paris-Rome problem of eqs. (1. 8), (1. 9) below).

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)