79,10 €
87,89 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
Liberty, Equality, Fraternity
79,10
87,89 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
With great energy and clarity, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829-1894), author of History of the Criminal Law of England, and judge of the High Court from 1879-91, challenges John Stuart Mill's On Liberty and On Utilitarianism, arguing that Mill's view of humanity is sentimental and utopian. "His writing is strong meat-full of the threat of hellfrire, the virtue of government by the lash and a fervent belief that the state cannot remain neutral but has a duty to espouse a moral code."-Roderick…
87.89
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Liberty, Equality, Fraternity (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

(3.79 Goodreads rating)

Description

With great energy and clarity, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829-1894), author of History of the Criminal Law of England, and judge of the High Court from 1879-91, challenges John Stuart Mill's On Liberty and On Utilitarianism, arguing that Mill's view of humanity is sentimental and utopian.

"His writing is strong meat-full of the threat of hellfrire, the virtue of government by the lash and a fervent belief that the state cannot remain neutral but has a duty to espouse a moral code."-Roderick Munday, Cambridge Law Journal

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

79,10
87,89 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 21d.18:11:35

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 0,88 Book Euros!?

With great energy and clarity, Sir James Fitzjames Stephen (1829-1894), author of History of the Criminal Law of England, and judge of the High Court from 1879-91, challenges John Stuart Mill's On Liberty and On Utilitarianism, arguing that Mill's view of humanity is sentimental and utopian.

"His writing is strong meat-full of the threat of hellfrire, the virtue of government by the lash and a fervent belief that the state cannot remain neutral but has a duty to espouse a moral code."-Roderick Munday, Cambridge Law Journal

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)