113,93 €
126,59 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Libel Law, Political Criticism, and Defamation of Public Figures
Libel Law, Political Criticism, and Defamation of Public Figures
113,93
126,59 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
Amponsah studies political defamation laws in the United States, the European Court of Human Rights, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Prevailing jurisprudence of each area weighs political speech against reputation through a preferred balancing approach which gives more protection to political speech. While the different jurisdictions place greater interest in political speech than individual reputation in matters of public concern and governance, all used multiple rationales such as the mark…
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Libel Law, Political Criticism, and Defamation of Public Figures (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

(4.00 Goodreads rating)

Description

Amponsah studies political defamation laws in the United States, the European Court of Human Rights, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Prevailing jurisprudence of each area weighs political speech against reputation through a preferred balancing approach which gives more protection to political speech. While the different jurisdictions place greater interest in political speech than individual reputation in matters of public concern and governance, all used multiple rationales such as the marketplace of ideas, self-fulfillment, search for truth, and democratic self-government principles to justify protection of political speech. Democratic jurisdictions give heightened protection for political speech by assimilating into their libel laws values embodied in multiple rationales for protecting political speech.

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

113,93
126,59 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 20d.18:46:10

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 1,27 Book Euros!?

Amponsah studies political defamation laws in the United States, the European Court of Human Rights, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Prevailing jurisprudence of each area weighs political speech against reputation through a preferred balancing approach which gives more protection to political speech. While the different jurisdictions place greater interest in political speech than individual reputation in matters of public concern and governance, all used multiple rationales such as the marketplace of ideas, self-fulfillment, search for truth, and democratic self-government principles to justify protection of political speech. Democratic jurisdictions give heightened protection for political speech by assimilating into their libel laws values embodied in multiple rationales for protecting political speech.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)