- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13175961/9783639134605.jpg)
- Author: John T Baun
- Publisher: VDM Verlag
- ISBN-10: 3639134605
- ISBN-13: 9783639134605
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.6 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Learning and Retention of Accelerated and Traditional Delivery (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
This Project was a study comparing the learning and retention of two different course delivery systems; a nine day accelerated format and a thirteen week traditional format. The course was given at an American Bar Association accreditated law school in Chicago, Illinois. Students consisted of second year and third year law students at the school and the course was a requirment for graduation from the program. Two cohorts of groups, an August and January cohort for the accelerated group and Fall and Spring Semester cohort for the traditional group in the 2005-6 academic year, were compared using a peer reviewed, Likert based survey instrument given within one week of course completion and again four months after course completion. The results of the survey were compared using T-tests. The resulting T- test revealed no statistically significant learning or retention differences between the two groups.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 17d.00:23:18
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: John T Baun
- Publisher: VDM Verlag
- ISBN-10: 3639134605
- ISBN-13: 9783639134605
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.6 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
This Project was a study comparing the learning and retention of two different course delivery systems; a nine day accelerated format and a thirteen week traditional format. The course was given at an American Bar Association accreditated law school in Chicago, Illinois. Students consisted of second year and third year law students at the school and the course was a requirment for graduation from the program. Two cohorts of groups, an August and January cohort for the accelerated group and Fall and Spring Semester cohort for the traditional group in the 2005-6 academic year, were compared using a peer reviewed, Likert based survey instrument given within one week of course completion and again four months after course completion. The results of the survey were compared using T-tests. The resulting T- test revealed no statistically significant learning or retention differences between the two groups.
Reviews