260,63 €
289,59 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Judicial Avoidance
Judicial Avoidance
260,63
289,59 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided? It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book: - Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?- How could judicial avoidance be…
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Judicial Avoidance (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

Description

This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?

It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:
- Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?
- How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?

The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying 'formal balancing' to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The 'formal balancing' methodology is based on Alexy's principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

260,63
289,59 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 18d.14:25:07

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 2,90 Book Euros!?

This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided?

It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book:
- Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?
- How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately?

The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying 'formal balancing' to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The 'formal balancing' methodology is based on Alexy's principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)