- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/9871562/9781442240728.jpg)
- Author: Scott Miller
- Publisher: Center for Strategic & International Studies
- ISBN-10: 1442240725
- ISBN-13: 9781442240728
- Format: 21.6 x 27.9 x 0.5 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a provision in Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) and other international investment agreements that allows investors to enter arbitration with states over treaty breaches. ISDS has become controversial in the United States and our negotiating partners; critics, including some governments, have argued that ISDS is unnecessary, while others insist it is illegitimate as public policy. Treaty-based investment protection represents a major advance in the fair treatment of aliens and the peaceful resolution of disputes. Given the alternatives, withdrawing from investment treaties--the logical conclusion of the critics' position--would likely have negative consequences for economic growth and the rule of law. This report is an empirical review of ISDS, based on the record of disputes under existing investment treaties.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 22d.21:42:20
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Scott Miller
- Publisher: Center for Strategic & International Studies
- ISBN-10: 1442240725
- ISBN-13: 9781442240728
- Format: 21.6 x 27.9 x 0.5 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) is a provision in Bilateral Investment Treaties (BITs) and other international investment agreements that allows investors to enter arbitration with states over treaty breaches. ISDS has become controversial in the United States and our negotiating partners; critics, including some governments, have argued that ISDS is unnecessary, while others insist it is illegitimate as public policy. Treaty-based investment protection represents a major advance in the fair treatment of aliens and the peaceful resolution of disputes. Given the alternatives, withdrawing from investment treaties--the logical conclusion of the critics' position--would likely have negative consequences for economic growth and the rule of law. This report is an empirical review of ISDS, based on the record of disputes under existing investment treaties.
Reviews