- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12356011/9781841271989.jpg)
- Author: William O Walker
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Year: 2002
- Pages: 233
- ISBN-10: 1841271985
- ISBN-13: 9781841271989
- Format: 16.2 x 24 x 2.1 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
In this fundamental and at times provocative study, Walker demonstrates that Paul's letters contain later, non-Pauline additions or interpolations and that such interpolations can sometimes be identified with relative confidence. He begins by establishing that interpolations are to be assumed simply on a priori grounds, that direct text-critical evidence is not essential for their recognition, that the burden of proof in their identification is lighter than most have assumed, and that specific evidence for interpolation is often available.Successive chapters then argue that 1 Cor. 11.3-16, 1 Cor. 2.6-16, 1 Cor. 12.31b-14.1a, and Rom. 1.18-2.29 are in fact non-Pauline interpolations, and Walker goes on to summarize arguments for the same conclusion regarding five additional passages. A brief epilogue addresses the question of interpolations and the canonical authority of scripture.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 23d.06:58:19
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: William O Walker
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Year: 2002
- Pages: 233
- ISBN-10: 1841271985
- ISBN-13: 9781841271989
- Format: 16.2 x 24 x 2.1 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English English
In this fundamental and at times provocative study, Walker demonstrates that Paul's letters contain later, non-Pauline additions or interpolations and that such interpolations can sometimes be identified with relative confidence. He begins by establishing that interpolations are to be assumed simply on a priori grounds, that direct text-critical evidence is not essential for their recognition, that the burden of proof in their identification is lighter than most have assumed, and that specific evidence for interpolation is often available.Successive chapters then argue that 1 Cor. 11.3-16, 1 Cor. 2.6-16, 1 Cor. 12.31b-14.1a, and Rom. 1.18-2.29 are in fact non-Pauline interpolations, and Walker goes on to summarize arguments for the same conclusion regarding five additional passages. A brief epilogue addresses the question of interpolations and the canonical authority of scripture.
Reviews