28,79 €
31,99 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Hatfield United States Department of Agriculture
Hatfield United States Department of Agriculture
28,79
31,99 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
Lum, Taylor, and Zidek have proposed a revised procedure for wood species grouping in ASTM standard D 1990. We applaud the authors' recognition of the importance of considering a strength distribution's variability as well as its fifth percentile. However, we have concerns about their proposed method of incorporating this information into a standard. We detail these concerns in this paper. We also provide both theoretical and empirical arguments that sug-gest that revisions of the standard shou…
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Hatfield United States Department of Agriculture (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

Description

Lum, Taylor, and Zidek have proposed a revised procedure for wood species grouping in ASTM standard D 1990. We applaud the authors' recognition of the importance of considering a strength distribution's variability as well as its fifth percentile. However, we have concerns about their proposed method of incorporating this information into a standard. We detail these concerns in this paper. We also provide both theoretical and empirical arguments that sug-gest that revisions of the standard should not be based on a two-parameter Weibull assumption.

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

28,79
31,99 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 18d.01:06:51

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 0,32 Book Euros!?

Lum, Taylor, and Zidek have proposed a revised procedure for wood species grouping in ASTM standard D 1990. We applaud the authors' recognition of the importance of considering a strength distribution's variability as well as its fifth percentile. However, we have concerns about their proposed method of incorporating this information into a standard. We detail these concerns in this paper. We also provide both theoretical and empirical arguments that sug-gest that revisions of the standard should not be based on a two-parameter Weibull assumption.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)