- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/2874387/9780195042283.jpg)
- Author: Peter Gay
- Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
- ISBN-10: 019504228X
- ISBN-13: 9780195042283
- Format: 14.2 x 21.6 x 1.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Is psychoanalysis a legitimate tool for helping us understand the past? Many traditional historians have answered with an emphatic no, greeting the introduction of Freud into historical study with responses ranging from condescending skepticism to outrage. Now Peter Gay, one of America's leading historians, builds an eloquent case for "history informed by psychoanalysis" and offers an impressive rebuttal to the charges of the profession's anti-Freudians.
In this book, Gay takes on the opposition's arguments, defending psychoanalysis as a discipline that can enhance social, economic, and literary studies. No mere polemic, Freud for Historians is a thoughtful and detailed contribution to a major intellectual debate.EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 23d.11:40:51
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Peter Gay
- Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
- ISBN-10: 019504228X
- ISBN-13: 9780195042283
- Format: 14.2 x 21.6 x 1.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Is psychoanalysis a legitimate tool for helping us understand the past? Many traditional historians have answered with an emphatic no, greeting the introduction of Freud into historical study with responses ranging from condescending skepticism to outrage. Now Peter Gay, one of America's leading historians, builds an eloquent case for "history informed by psychoanalysis" and offers an impressive rebuttal to the charges of the profession's anti-Freudians.
In this book, Gay takes on the opposition's arguments, defending psychoanalysis as a discipline that can enhance social, economic, and literary studies. No mere polemic, Freud for Historians is a thoughtful and detailed contribution to a major intellectual debate.
Reviews