- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/11371913/9781605978529.jpg)
- Author: Samuel Butler
- Publisher: Book Jungle
- Year: 2008
- Pages: 292
- ISBN-10: 1605978523
- ISBN-13: 9781605978529
- Format: 19.1 x 23.5 x 1.6 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Evolution is as controversial a topic now as it was in the 19th century when Darwin first proposed his theories. Evolution, Old & New Or, the Theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck, as compared with that of Charles Darwin was written by Samuel Butler (1835 - 1902). From the introduction: "Can we or can we not see signs in the structure of animals and plants, of something which carries with it the idea of contrivance so strongly that it is impossible for us to think of the structure, without at the same time thinking of contrivance, or design, in connection with it? It is my object in the present work to answer this question in the affirmative, and to lead my reader to agree with me, perhaps mainly, by following the history of that opinion which is now supposed to be fatal to a purposive view of animal and vegetable organs. I refer to the theory of evolution or descent with modification."
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.11:09:40
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Samuel Butler
- Publisher: Book Jungle
- Year: 2008
- Pages: 292
- ISBN-10: 1605978523
- ISBN-13: 9781605978529
- Format: 19.1 x 23.5 x 1.6 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Evolution is as controversial a topic now as it was in the 19th century when Darwin first proposed his theories. Evolution, Old & New Or, the Theories of Buffon, Dr. Erasmus Darwin and Lamarck, as compared with that of Charles Darwin was written by Samuel Butler (1835 - 1902). From the introduction: "Can we or can we not see signs in the structure of animals and plants, of something which carries with it the idea of contrivance so strongly that it is impossible for us to think of the structure, without at the same time thinking of contrivance, or design, in connection with it? It is my object in the present work to answer this question in the affirmative, and to lead my reader to agree with me, perhaps mainly, by following the history of that opinion which is now supposed to be fatal to a purposive view of animal and vegetable organs. I refer to the theory of evolution or descent with modification."
Reviews