Reviews
Description
Seminar paper from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Investment and Finance, grade: 2,7, University of Cologne, course: Bachelorseminar Corporate Finance, language: English, abstract: This paper seeks to examine different models to forecast revenue of companies. This is being achieved by examining costs of capital, which are a good representative therefor. The models examined in this paper can be divided into two sections. First, there are mechanical models, second there is one characteristic-based model. The models stand in contrast to analysts' forecasts. This paper sums up different authors who illustrate, that mechanical models outperform analysts' forecasts in terms of revenue forecasting. First, the HVZ mode is introduced which is due to outperform analysts' forecasts. Second, the EP and RI model are introduced, next to a random walk model (RW model) as a benchmark. Objective of this paper is to find out which advantages go along with mechanical models, and whether the quality of forecast could be influenced positively. The topic of revenue forecast is highly relevant for different stakeholders in the financial industry. Based on revenue forecasts investment decisions are met by investors. One advantage of mechanical models therefore, is the greater feasibility due to the greater coverage. Mechanical models rely on firm fundamentals and are hence available for much more companies. Analysts' forecasts are only available for firms of a certain size upwards. Costs of capital are a topic of focus not only for investment decisions but also for internal application. Apart from the use as a financial ratio it is negatively associated with customer satisfaction. The paper finds out, that the HVZ model outperforms analysts' forecasts in terms of forecast bias and earnings response coefficient. However, the HVZ model does not outperform analysts' forecasts in terms of accuracy. The EP and RI model both outperform the HVZ model in terms of all three cri
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 23d.03:40:37
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
Seminar paper from the year 2018 in the subject Business economics - Investment and Finance, grade: 2,7, University of Cologne, course: Bachelorseminar Corporate Finance, language: English, abstract: This paper seeks to examine different models to forecast revenue of companies. This is being achieved by examining costs of capital, which are a good representative therefor. The models examined in this paper can be divided into two sections. First, there are mechanical models, second there is one characteristic-based model. The models stand in contrast to analysts' forecasts. This paper sums up different authors who illustrate, that mechanical models outperform analysts' forecasts in terms of revenue forecasting. First, the HVZ mode is introduced which is due to outperform analysts' forecasts. Second, the EP and RI model are introduced, next to a random walk model (RW model) as a benchmark. Objective of this paper is to find out which advantages go along with mechanical models, and whether the quality of forecast could be influenced positively. The topic of revenue forecast is highly relevant for different stakeholders in the financial industry. Based on revenue forecasts investment decisions are met by investors. One advantage of mechanical models therefore, is the greater feasibility due to the greater coverage. Mechanical models rely on firm fundamentals and are hence available for much more companies. Analysts' forecasts are only available for firms of a certain size upwards. Costs of capital are a topic of focus not only for investment decisions but also for internal application. Apart from the use as a financial ratio it is negatively associated with customer satisfaction. The paper finds out, that the HVZ model outperforms analysts' forecasts in terms of forecast bias and earnings response coefficient. However, the HVZ model does not outperform analysts' forecasts in terms of accuracy. The EP and RI model both outperform the HVZ model in terms of all three cri
Reviews