- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/14762526/9786207804368.jpg)
- Author: Danielle C Souza de Andrade
- Publisher: Our Knowledge Publishing
- ISBN-10: 6207804368
- ISBN-13: 9786207804368
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.5 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Evaluation and analysis of scientific production in Qualis Periodicals (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
This paper analyses and reflects on the role that the evaluation of scientific production in Qualis A1 (production considered to be of excellence) has played in Postgraduate Programmes in Education and in the scientific field. The scientific production produced by teachers and students is periodically evaluated by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (Capes), the body responsible for evaluation. Thus, the problem arises around the evaluation criteria proposed by Capes for assessing the production of scientific knowledge and how these have affected the programmes and the scientific field. In this way, the aim is to understand the bases that underpin the evaluation criteria proposed by Capes and what is considered excellent scientific production.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 18d.13:03:22
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Danielle C Souza de Andrade
- Publisher: Our Knowledge Publishing
- ISBN-10: 6207804368
- ISBN-13: 9786207804368
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.5 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
This paper analyses and reflects on the role that the evaluation of scientific production in Qualis A1 (production considered to be of excellence) has played in Postgraduate Programmes in Education and in the scientific field. The scientific production produced by teachers and students is periodically evaluated by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education (Capes), the body responsible for evaluation. Thus, the problem arises around the evaluation criteria proposed by Capes for assessing the production of scientific knowledge and how these have affected the programmes and the scientific field. In this way, the aim is to understand the bases that underpin the evaluation criteria proposed by Capes and what is considered excellent scientific production.
Reviews