- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/3445659/9780415728164.jpg)
- Author: Lorraine Besser
- Publisher: Routledge
- ISBN-10: 0415728169
- ISBN-13: 9780415728164
- Format: 15.8 x 22.9 x 1.8 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
In this book, Lorraine Besser-Jones develops a eudaimonistic virtue ethics based on a psychological account of human nature. While her project maintains the fundamental features of the eudaimonistic virtue ethical framework--virtue, character, and well-being--she constructs these concepts from an empirical basis, drawing support from the psychological fields of self-determination and self-regulation theory. Besser-Jones's resulting account of "eudaimonic ethics" presents a compelling normative theory and offers insight into what is involved in being a virtuous person and "acting well." This original contribution to contemporary ethics and moral psychology puts forward a provocative hypothesis of what an empirically-based moral theory would look like.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 23d.07:46:34
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Lorraine Besser
- Publisher: Routledge
- ISBN-10: 0415728169
- ISBN-13: 9780415728164
- Format: 15.8 x 22.9 x 1.8 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English English
In this book, Lorraine Besser-Jones develops a eudaimonistic virtue ethics based on a psychological account of human nature. While her project maintains the fundamental features of the eudaimonistic virtue ethical framework--virtue, character, and well-being--she constructs these concepts from an empirical basis, drawing support from the psychological fields of self-determination and self-regulation theory. Besser-Jones's resulting account of "eudaimonic ethics" presents a compelling normative theory and offers insight into what is involved in being a virtuous person and "acting well." This original contribution to contemporary ethics and moral psychology puts forward a provocative hypothesis of what an empirically-based moral theory would look like.
Reviews