28,79 €
31,99 €
-10% with code: EXTRA
Effects of Climate Variability on Forest Hydrology and Carbon Sequestration on the Santee Experimental Forest in Coastal South Carolina
Effects of Climate Variability on Forest Hydrology and Carbon Sequestration on the Santee Experimental Forest in Coastal South Carolina
28,79
31,99 €
  • We will send in 10–14 business days.
Long-term weather and hydrology data from the Santee Experimental Forest were used to assess trends in air temperature, precipitation, and the water balance in gauged watersheds over a 63-year period. Since 1946, the mean annual air temperature has increased at a rate of 0.19 °C per decade, a rate higher than the global mean for the same period. Total annual precipitation has not changed significantly over the period of 1946-2008; however, large storm events (>50 mm precipitation) have increas…
  • SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA

Effects of Climate Variability on Forest Hydrology and Carbon Sequestration on the Santee Experimental Forest in Coastal South Carolina (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu

Reviews

Description

Long-term weather and hydrology data from the Santee Experimental Forest were used to assess trends in air temperature, precipitation, and the water balance in gauged watersheds over a 63-year period. Since 1946, the mean annual air temperature has increased at a rate of 0.19 °C per decade, a rate higher than the global mean for the same period. Total annual precipitation has not changed significantly over the period of 1946-2008; however, large storm events (>50 mm precipitation) have increased 21 percent over the 63-year period. Annual stream discharge has varied from 5.5 percent of annual precipitation in dry years to 44.7 percent in wet years. In 1989, much of the forest was destroyed by Hurricane Hugo, a disturbance that, in turn, influenced streamflow. The water balance was estimated using the hydrologic model MIKE SHE; the long-term simulations showed that average annual flow was about 24 percent of annual precipitation and that mean annual evapotranspiration was approximately 76 percent over the 63-year period. The carbon balance on the 500-ha watershed was evaluated using Forest-DNDC. The model performance efficiency was 0.67 for soil CO2 efflux, 0.70 for soil temperature, 0.40 for soil moisture, and 0.86 for wood biomass dynamics, demonstrating that this model was applicable for predicting carbon dynamics for this complex forest mosaic.

EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA

28,79
31,99 €
We will send in 10–14 business days.

The promotion ends in 18d.03:09:05

The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.

Log in and for this item
you will receive 0,32 Book Euros!?

Long-term weather and hydrology data from the Santee Experimental Forest were used to assess trends in air temperature, precipitation, and the water balance in gauged watersheds over a 63-year period. Since 1946, the mean annual air temperature has increased at a rate of 0.19 °C per decade, a rate higher than the global mean for the same period. Total annual precipitation has not changed significantly over the period of 1946-2008; however, large storm events (>50 mm precipitation) have increased 21 percent over the 63-year period. Annual stream discharge has varied from 5.5 percent of annual precipitation in dry years to 44.7 percent in wet years. In 1989, much of the forest was destroyed by Hurricane Hugo, a disturbance that, in turn, influenced streamflow. The water balance was estimated using the hydrologic model MIKE SHE; the long-term simulations showed that average annual flow was about 24 percent of annual precipitation and that mean annual evapotranspiration was approximately 76 percent over the 63-year period. The carbon balance on the 500-ha watershed was evaluated using Forest-DNDC. The model performance efficiency was 0.67 for soil CO2 efflux, 0.70 for soil temperature, 0.40 for soil moisture, and 0.86 for wood biomass dynamics, demonstrating that this model was applicable for predicting carbon dynamics for this complex forest mosaic.

Reviews

  • No reviews
0 customers have rated this item.
5
0%
4
0%
3
0%
2
0%
1
0%
(will not be displayed)