- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4394062/9780810885745.jpg)
- Author: Thomas H P Gould
- Publisher: Scarecrow Press
- ISBN-10: 0810885743
- ISBN-13: 9780810885745
- Format: 15 x 22.4 x 1.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
The current peer review process is broken and unless changes are made it will soon die. In Do We Still Need Peer Review?, author Thomas H.P. Gould examines the evolution of peer review from the earliest attempts by the Church to evaluate scholarly works to the creation of academic peer review and finally to the current status of the process. Gould argues that without an immediate effort by scholars to institute reform, the future of peer review may cease to exist. As new technology provides authors with a direct, unsupervised route to publication, the peer review situation is nearing a tipping point, beyond which the nature of academic research will be profoundly altered. This book proposes that rather than tossing out peer review altogether, the process can be saved and made stronger, offering suggestions on how to do just that.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.09:24:49
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Thomas H P Gould
- Publisher: Scarecrow Press
- ISBN-10: 0810885743
- ISBN-13: 9780810885745
- Format: 15 x 22.4 x 1.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
The current peer review process is broken and unless changes are made it will soon die. In Do We Still Need Peer Review?, author Thomas H.P. Gould examines the evolution of peer review from the earliest attempts by the Church to evaluate scholarly works to the creation of academic peer review and finally to the current status of the process. Gould argues that without an immediate effort by scholars to institute reform, the future of peer review may cease to exist. As new technology provides authors with a direct, unsupervised route to publication, the peer review situation is nearing a tipping point, beyond which the nature of academic research will be profoundly altered. This book proposes that rather than tossing out peer review altogether, the process can be saved and made stronger, offering suggestions on how to do just that.
Reviews