- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/11220892/9781560115922.jpg)
- Author: David N Ammons
- Publisher: Unc School of Government
- Year: 2009
- Pages: 128
- ISBN-10: 1560115920
- ISBN-13: 9781560115922
- Format: 21.5 x 27.3 x 0.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Approving or denying building permits and other land-use applications is an important role of local governments but one that often draws criticism from developers and citizens alike. This volume identifies an array of proven practices for bringing greater fairness, thoroughness, and speed to the development review process. The authors and a team of planning and development review professionals benchmarked with three national leaders and discovered seventy-eight distinctive practices accounting for the leaders' success. In doing so, the benchmarking team not only produced helpful advice for improving development review processes but also demonstrated the value to local governments of a type of benchmarking fairly common in the private sector but rarely used in the public sector.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.17:46:03
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: David N Ammons
- Publisher: Unc School of Government
- Year: 2009
- Pages: 128
- ISBN-10: 1560115920
- ISBN-13: 9781560115922
- Format: 21.5 x 27.3 x 0.8 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Approving or denying building permits and other land-use applications is an important role of local governments but one that often draws criticism from developers and citizens alike. This volume identifies an array of proven practices for bringing greater fairness, thoroughness, and speed to the development review process. The authors and a team of planning and development review professionals benchmarked with three national leaders and discovered seventy-eight distinctive practices accounting for the leaders' success. In doing so, the benchmarking team not only produced helpful advice for improving development review processes but also demonstrated the value to local governments of a type of benchmarking fairly common in the private sector but rarely used in the public sector.
Reviews