- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4357860/9780804720304.jpg)
- Author: Michèle Barrett
- Publisher: Stanford University Press
- ISBN-10: 0804720304
- ISBN-13: 9780804720304
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.4 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
In the past decade the central principles of western feminist theory have been dramatically challenged. many feminists have endorsed post-structuralism's rejection of essentialist theoretical categories, and have added a powerful gender dimension to contemporary critiques of modernity. Earlier 'women' have been radically undermined, and newer concerns with 'difference', 'identity', and 'power' have emerged. Destabilizing Theory explores these developments in a set of specially commissioned essays by feminist theorists. Does this change amount to a real shift within feminist theory, or will feminism's links with an emancipatory modernism reinstate an older political agenda? Can we transcend the common counterposition of equality and difference, or is feminism condemned to argue within the terms of this binary opposition?
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 17d.10:37:21
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Michèle Barrett
- Publisher: Stanford University Press
- ISBN-10: 0804720304
- ISBN-13: 9780804720304
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 1.4 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
In the past decade the central principles of western feminist theory have been dramatically challenged. many feminists have endorsed post-structuralism's rejection of essentialist theoretical categories, and have added a powerful gender dimension to contemporary critiques of modernity. Earlier 'women' have been radically undermined, and newer concerns with 'difference', 'identity', and 'power' have emerged. Destabilizing Theory explores these developments in a set of specially commissioned essays by feminist theorists. Does this change amount to a real shift within feminist theory, or will feminism's links with an emancipatory modernism reinstate an older political agenda? Can we transcend the common counterposition of equality and difference, or is feminism condemned to argue within the terms of this binary opposition?
Reviews