- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/8185591/9781349261116.jpg)
- Author: Martin Sherman
- Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
- Year: 1998
- Pages: 230
- ISBN-10: 1349261114
- ISBN-13: 9781349261116
- Format: 14 x 21.6 x 1.4 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Despots, Democrats and the Determinants of International Conflict (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
An unequivocal endorsement of an assertive and resolute approach to foreign policy by democracies in their dealings with dictatorships. Drawing on the political writings of Kant, the rationale of Churchill's anti-appeasement policy, and the most up-to-date empirical research in international relations, the author forges a rigorous decision-theoretic model to account for the international interactions between despotic and democratic regimes. The model's validity is illustrated across a broad range of historical examples, while its policy-oriented implications, are shown to have far-reaching consequences for conventional perceptions of democratic deterrence posture and the security dilemma.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.04:54:18
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Martin Sherman
- Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan
- Year: 1998
- Pages: 230
- ISBN-10: 1349261114
- ISBN-13: 9781349261116
- Format: 14 x 21.6 x 1.4 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
An unequivocal endorsement of an assertive and resolute approach to foreign policy by democracies in their dealings with dictatorships. Drawing on the political writings of Kant, the rationale of Churchill's anti-appeasement policy, and the most up-to-date empirical research in international relations, the author forges a rigorous decision-theoretic model to account for the international interactions between despotic and democratic regimes. The model's validity is illustrated across a broad range of historical examples, while its policy-oriented implications, are shown to have far-reaching consequences for conventional perceptions of democratic deterrence posture and the security dilemma.
Reviews