- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/13225434/9783658037796.jpg)
- Author: Mark Broere
- Publisher: Springer Gabler
- Year: 2013
- Pages: 212
- ISBN-10: 3658037792
- ISBN-13: 9783658037796
- Format: 14.8 x 21 x 1.4 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
The decisions of private equity firms affect the development of industries and national economies, yet little is known about how these decisions are made. Mark Broere uses proprietary survey data from 136 private equity firms (venture capital and buyout) located in the US, Canada, and Europe to explore determinants and rules of their decision-making. The results exhibit new facts about their objectives, success measures, decision criteria, exit decision power and rules. A discussion in light of existing financial theory highlights, e.g. the role of reputation, and potential pitfalls in the decision-making of practitioners. The author suggests that private equity firms might improve their performance by a more careful choice of decision rules and criteria and by a more consistent application of these across varying decision types.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 20d.18:42:51
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Mark Broere
- Publisher: Springer Gabler
- Year: 2013
- Pages: 212
- ISBN-10: 3658037792
- ISBN-13: 9783658037796
- Format: 14.8 x 21 x 1.4 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
The decisions of private equity firms affect the development of industries and national economies, yet little is known about how these decisions are made. Mark Broere uses proprietary survey data from 136 private equity firms (venture capital and buyout) located in the US, Canada, and Europe to explore determinants and rules of their decision-making. The results exhibit new facts about their objectives, success measures, decision criteria, exit decision power and rules. A discussion in light of existing financial theory highlights, e.g. the role of reputation, and potential pitfalls in the decision-making of practitioners. The author suggests that private equity firms might improve their performance by a more careful choice of decision rules and criteria and by a more consistent application of these across varying decision types.
Reviews