- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/11570676/9781639028641.jpg)
- Author: Yoshihide Nakai
- Publisher: Generis Publishing
- ISBN-10: 1639028641
- ISBN-13: 9781639028641
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.2 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Comparison of imo and Humphrey field analyzer perimeters in glaucomatous eyes (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
To compare the imo perimeter, a new portable head-mounted perimeter unit that enables both eyes to be examined quickly and simultaneously, with the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) perimeter to investigate correlations and their diagnostic ability in glaucomatous eyes. We tested the performance of this equipment in 128 [i1][n2]glaucomatous eyes and 40 normal eyes. We investigated the correlations of mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, and visual field index and the sensitivity. The imo perimeter had a short measurement time, and compared with HFA, the imo perimeter showed no significant difference between each parameter and the diagnostic ability. Measurements of mean deviation (r=0.886, P
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.01:25:19
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Yoshihide Nakai
- Publisher: Generis Publishing
- ISBN-10: 1639028641
- ISBN-13: 9781639028641
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.2 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
To compare the imo perimeter, a new portable head-mounted perimeter unit that enables both eyes to be examined quickly and simultaneously, with the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) perimeter to investigate correlations and their diagnostic ability in glaucomatous eyes. We tested the performance of this equipment in 128 [i1][n2]glaucomatous eyes and 40 normal eyes. We investigated the correlations of mean deviation, pattern standard deviation, and visual field index and the sensitivity. The imo perimeter had a short measurement time, and compared with HFA, the imo perimeter showed no significant difference between each parameter and the diagnostic ability. Measurements of mean deviation (r=0.886, P
Reviews