- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/5647146/9781108496407.jpg)
- Author: Markus Kornprobst
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- Year: 2019
- Pages: 346
- ISBN-10: 1108496407
- ISBN-13: 9781108496407
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 2.1 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Markus Kornprobst examines the common assumption that states usually respond to crises individually, rather than together. He develops an innovative approach to analyse how crisis co-management comes to succeed or fail. He argues that actors draw from repertoires of taken-for-granted ideas, forming a set of pre-judgments. These are then revisited in justificatory encounters, making various degrees of co-management possible or impossible. This judging and justifying in turn leaves an impression on repertoires put to use for co-managing the next crisis. The author uses this model to analyse the attempts by France, Germany and the United Kingdom to co-manage the crises in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq. He links individual reasoning and communication, paving the way for further research into crisis co-management, and providing novel insights into European attempts to act in international affairs.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 23d.23:11:38
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Markus Kornprobst
- Publisher: Cambridge University Press
- Year: 2019
- Pages: 346
- ISBN-10: 1108496407
- ISBN-13: 9781108496407
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 2.1 cm, kieti viršeliai
- Language: English English
Markus Kornprobst examines the common assumption that states usually respond to crises individually, rather than together. He develops an innovative approach to analyse how crisis co-management comes to succeed or fail. He argues that actors draw from repertoires of taken-for-granted ideas, forming a set of pre-judgments. These are then revisited in justificatory encounters, making various degrees of co-management possible or impossible. This judging and justifying in turn leaves an impression on repertoires put to use for co-managing the next crisis. The author uses this model to analyse the attempts by France, Germany and the United Kingdom to co-manage the crises in Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan and Iraq. He links individual reasoning and communication, paving the way for further research into crisis co-management, and providing novel insights into European attempts to act in international affairs.
Reviews