- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12356045/9781841272702.jpg)
- Author: Erin Runions
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Year: 2002
- ISBN-10: 1841272701
- ISBN-13: 9781841272702
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.6 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
Coming from a strong gender critical and post-colonial theoretical stance, Runions takes up important questions of the reading process that arise from literary, ideological critical and cultural studies approaches to the Bible. She examines readers' negotiations with the ambiguous configurations of gender, nation and future vision in the book of Micah, using the theoretical work of Homi Bhabha with Louis Althusser, Jacques Lacan, Slavoj Zizek-all key figures in cultural studies. Her book confronts the problem of the determined subject reading an indeterminate text and suggests that (liminal) identifications with the ambiguitiesof the book of Micah might reconfigure the readers' own ideological positions.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 16d.15:35:51
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Erin Runions
- Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC
- Year: 2002
- ISBN-10: 1841272701
- ISBN-13: 9781841272702
- Format: 15.6 x 23.4 x 1.6 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
Coming from a strong gender critical and post-colonial theoretical stance, Runions takes up important questions of the reading process that arise from literary, ideological critical and cultural studies approaches to the Bible. She examines readers' negotiations with the ambiguous configurations of gender, nation and future vision in the book of Micah, using the theoretical work of Homi Bhabha with Louis Althusser, Jacques Lacan, Slavoj Zizek-all key figures in cultural studies. Her book confronts the problem of the determined subject reading an indeterminate text and suggests that (liminal) identifications with the ambiguitiesof the book of Micah might reconfigure the readers' own ideological positions.
Reviews