- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/12579061/9781937002213.jpg)
- Publisher: Apocryphile Press
- ISBN-10: 1937002217
- ISBN-13: 9781937002213
- Format: 14 x 21.6 x 1 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Bram Stoker's Dracula (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
There is a common misconception that the early critical reception of Bram Stoker's famed vampire novel, Dracula (1897), was "mixed." This reference book sets out to dispel this myth en force by offering the most exhaustive collection of early critical responses to Stoker's novel ever assembled, including some 91 reviews and reactions as well as 36 different press notices, many of which have not been seen in print since they appeared over 100 years ago. What these early critical responses reveal about Dracula's writing is that it was predominantly seen by early reviewers and responders to parallel, even supersede the Gothic horror works of such canonical writers as Mary Shelley, Ann Radcliffe, and Edgar Allan Poe. Accompanying the critical responses are annotations and an introduction by the editor, a bibliographical afterword by J. Gordon Melton, 32 illustrations, and a bibliography.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 21d.01:24:56
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Publisher: Apocryphile Press
- ISBN-10: 1937002217
- ISBN-13: 9781937002213
- Format: 14 x 21.6 x 1 cm, minkšti viršeliai
- Language: English English
There is a common misconception that the early critical reception of Bram Stoker's famed vampire novel, Dracula (1897), was "mixed." This reference book sets out to dispel this myth en force by offering the most exhaustive collection of early critical responses to Stoker's novel ever assembled, including some 91 reviews and reactions as well as 36 different press notices, many of which have not been seen in print since they appeared over 100 years ago. What these early critical responses reveal about Dracula's writing is that it was predominantly seen by early reviewers and responders to parallel, even supersede the Gothic horror works of such canonical writers as Mary Shelley, Ann Radcliffe, and Edgar Allan Poe. Accompanying the critical responses are annotations and an introduction by the editor, a bibliographical afterword by J. Gordon Melton, 32 illustrations, and a bibliography.
Reviews